It owns a young fleet of 44 OSVs with the average of 4.5 years is riding the wave of contracts in the O&G sector.
The
latest contracts are expected to boost the company’s utilization rate
to above 80%. The rising demand coupled with limited supply has jacked
up charter rates which augurs well for vessel operators like Alam
Maritim.
It has secured a RM576mil contract from Petronas
Carigali Sdn Bhd to provide six marine vessels. The RM576mil included an
extension option, if exercised. The contract, which has taken effect
from Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2017 is for a firm period of five years. The
contract was expected to positively contribute to the group's earnings
and net assets for the financial years ending Dec 31, 2013 and beyond.
Its balance sheet as at Sept 30 2012 showed that Alam Maritim had borrowings of rm561 million and a cash pile of rm111 million.
To
sustain its share price momentum (Jan 2013), it needs to clinch
contracts for its offshore installation and construction and subsea
business divisions. If it ails to do so, the company’s earnings growth
will be jeopardised because of the OIC division may sink into losses of
no new contract is secured in the near future.
The risk remains with its OIC and subsea businesses.
The
existing contract will expire in April 2013 and if the company lands no
new contracts after that, it will incur losses of rm3 million to rm4
million a month as it still has pay divers and all. The losses will
offset the bullishness of its OSV division.
Towards the end of
1QFY2013, we may see profit taking if the company does not secure any
contract for its OIC and subsea businesses as earnings growth is not
going to be great then.
However it is beefing up its orderbook for OIC
Outside Malaysia, Alam Maritim has been invited to submit bids for Middle Eastern and African jobs.
Shareholders could receive a special dividend, even though the low cost carrier has placed a firm order for 100 new aircraft.
It
purchased 24 planes in 2012 but it still had free cash flow of over
rm300 million them – thanks to the listing of its two associates in
Thailand and Indonesia. After their IPOs. The associates will now (Jan
2013) buy their own planes and carry the assets in their own books and
not in Airasia’s, unlike in the past.
While the special dividend still needs to be approved, it is likely to pay out a larger portion of its net profit.
The
biggest beneficiaries of the dividend payput would be its largest
shareholder – Tune Air Sdn Bhd (which has a 25.49% stake), Wellington
Management Co (11.31%) and the EPF with 7.61%.
The budget
carrier’s move to pay a generous dividend is a departure from the norm
in the lowest carrier segment, where companies normally keep their cash
expansion. However the group has been making steady profits and this is
in a good position to reward its shareholders.
As at Sept 30,
2012 it had net gearing ratio of slightly over one based on its total
borrowings of rm7.81 billion, shareholders’ funds of rm5.5 billion and
cash of rm2.2 billion.
What may comfort investors is that by
2017, most of Airasia’s orders would be fully paid for, giving it the
option to sell or even lease out its fleet of older aircraft.
Its prospects
Escalating fuel
costs, which has haunted Tenaga could be a thing of the past following
the structural changes in the energy sector.
The price of coal, a
commodity which Tenaga purchases at spot price has been fallen below
US$100 per tonne. It has been hovering between US$90 and US$95 during
Dec 2012 – Jan 2013.
The softer prices will benefit Tenaga as
the commodity accounts for about 36% of its total fuel cost. Coal is the
second largest source of fuel for Tenaga after gas. Considering that
coal is purchased at market prices, a lower price means a better bottom
line for Tenaga.
Weak coal prices would give Tenaga’s earnings
for current fiscal year a big boost. It is estimated that for every US$1
drop in coal prices, this translates into a cost saving of US$21
million for Tenaga.
Sentiment for Tenaga has improved amid
optimism that the risk to the group’s earnings has declined given the
reforms in the energy sector. This includes decreasing capacity payments
for two first generation IPPs whose power purcahse agreements have been
renewed with adjustments on the payments to Tenaga.
It is now (Jan 2013) just a question of timing for fuel cost pass through mechanism to be put in place.
The
power capacity payment is expected to save Tenaga about rm500 million
to rm600 million a year out of the rm1.4 billion that is paid to the
first generation IPPs.
It is understood that the amount saved
will be pooled to form a stabilization fund to compensate Tenaga if it
is unable to pass on the fuel cost increments to the end consumers.
As
the fund snowballs over time, it will help to cushion any adverse
impact brought on by a spike in fuel costs. This, to some extent, has
reduced concerns that the utility giant’s earnings would always be hard
hit by higher fuel costs due to the failure to pass on additional costs
to the consumer as it had always done so in the past.
The
ongoing sector reform is positive for Tenaga over the longer term with
more competitive pricing of power supply from the IPPs. But right now
(Jan 2013), it needs the tariff hike to address rising gas costs, in
line with the government’s plan to gradually reduce the fuel subsidy.
It
is well known that there is a lack of political will to put in place a
fuel cost pass through mechanism for Malaysia’s electricity tariff.
However the ruling government would have a stronger impetus after the GE
when it comes to cutting subsidies to narrow Malaysia’s budget deficit.
By
the second half of 2013 expect an acceleration of initiatives to
improve Tenaga’s operations. This could lead to higher electricity
tariffs and better economic returns for Tenaga.
Nevertheless,
the less optimistic believe it is too early to be overly optimistic
about Tenaga’s prospects. They say the government still has not shown
any firm indication of whether there will be a revival of the gas
subsidy rationalization plan. Under the plan, Malaysia’s gas price has
to be increased very six months, something that has not been happening.
There
is no certainty on gas prices. Very soon, Tenaga will have to import at
market prices and it is still not known if the price can be passed on
to consumers.
The only concern is Tenaga’s vulnerability to
government regulation as the company has virtually no control over its
pricing structure or costs.
Passing on the increases in the fuel cost has long been a challenge for Tenaga. Will the scenario be any different after the GE.
Lion Industries
William Cheng
Ø 20.14% stake in Parkson Holdings
Ø 40.61% stake in Lion Industries
Ø 28.67% stake in Lion Diversified
Lion Diversified
Ø 49.2% stake in Lion Corp
Lion Industries
Ø 14.5% in Lion Corp
Ø 72% stake in Lion Forest
Ø 24.55% stake in Parkson Holdings
Ø 20.85% stake in Lion Diversified
What’s NEXT! … dated Jan 2013
The
proposed corporate restructuring at the Lion group of companies, aimed
at reducing debts and streamlining the conglomerate’s diversified
business interests, is a preclude to a separate reorganization ahead of
the group’s planned partial divestment of its beleaguered steel
business.
This is the first phase and the next move will be to
put the entire steel business into a SPV to make way for a strategic
investor.
But how quickly Lion pushes ahead with its corporate
restructuring will depend on how tightly the government decides to
regulate the import of steel products under a new plan to protect local
players. Until the steel blueprint this will be a a holding pattern.
Unless the group is accorded enough protection against cheap steel
imports, potential suitors for its steel business will stay in the
sidelines.
In early Jan 2013, Lion Corp’s flagship listed entity
received the go ahead from its lenders to dispose of its entitre 25.34%
stake in Lion Industries Bhd to group chairman Tan Sri William Cheng
and Dynamic Horizon Holdings Ltd.
That in turn will give the
Cheng family a tighter grip on the group’s yet to be completed blast
furnace project. Estimated to cost rouglhy rm3.2 billion, the blast
furnace is being touted as central to the revival of the Lion group’s
Megasteel Sdn Bhd. Proponents of the blast furnace in Banting say it
will radically cut operating costs and help improvev the quality of
Megasteel’s products.
Work on the blast furnace has been
disrupted by funding problems and is only 18% completed. Cheng has been
courting potential investor to help revive his steel business but talks
that began two years ago were derailed by the uncertainty in the
domestic steel sector.
As Malaysia’s only integrated flat steel
producer, Megasteel has been given protection in the form of tariffs and
import restrictions on the product. But the company has been swamped by
losses which it blames on the so called illegal import of flat steel.
Megasteel
will continue to enjoy government protection for up to 24 months if its
able to get back into a positive cash flow position by mid 2013.
Cheng
appears to be betting that this target can be achieved. He and parties
related to him are proposing to acquire the shares in Lion Ind.
Lion industries registered a net assets per share of rm4.40 for 2012. But its operations have been loss making since 2009.
Its Prospects … dated Dec 2012
It still has huge
room for growth given the low existing pay TV household penetration rate
of 50%, a potential uptick in ARPU as subscribers migrate to the HD
platform, its superior content and high entry barriers to the pay TV
industry due to significant economies of scale.
Currently (Dec
2012) 1.8 million households have already migrated over to the HD
platform (55% of Astro’s pay TV subscriber base) and management intends
to swap out most of its legacy standard definition set top boxes by end
FY2014.
It is believed that most of its customers will subscribe
to High Definition (HD) contents when the company migrates all its
customers to the new HD platform. As at October 31, 2012, Astro has over
3.2 million subscribers, of which about 1.77 million (or 55 per cent of
subscribers) are currently (Dec 2012) watching their TV contents via
the Astro B.yond set-top boxes. Of the 1.77 million customers, about
two-thirds subscribe to HD contents.
HD channel is one of its key
differentiators against what is available out there, whether it's
privacy or other content providers.
Having most of its customers
to subscribe to HD contents is one of the key for Astro's growth over
the next few years from Dec 2012.
Astro’s partnership with Maxis and
TimeDotCom to provide IPTV services to the masses could provide a new
avenue of growth, with the bundling of voice, broadband and IPTV
services to offer new products to consumers.
It will be catalyzed by a convergence of media platforms and successful execution of its new IPTV product.
After
all, Astro’s dominance today (Dec 2012) grew on the back of monopoly –
which ends in 2017 – of satellite technology which is old compared with
HSBB-powered TV.
Competition will be stronger as Astro will be
challenged by TM’s triple play service on HSBB network. Astro is looking
to launch its triple play service with MAXIS by end of Jan 2013 and on
TM’s fiber network by April 2012.
Astro enjoys a monopoly on the
pay TV industry with a market share of more than 95% and TM;s Hypp TV
being its only. However, ABN Media Corp, a newcomer in the pay TV is
looking to challenge the incumbent with grand and ambitious plans in
mind.
Regardless of how ABN ups the ante against Astro, industry
observers do not foresee the latter faltering and surrendering market
share given its strong brand and resilient ecosystem which the company
took many years to establish and nurture.
Some observers opined that AStro still faces the threat of new players, high content costs and regulatory risks.
It
is open to sharing its contents with its rivals - as long as it makes
business sense to the company and the company is constantly in talks
with parties on such arrangements. Under the new content-sharing rules,
all TV stations without broadcasting rights to certain major sports
events would be able to share the contents obtained from rights holder
on reasonable commer-cial terms.
Its revenue rose 11.5% to
RM3.133bil from RM2.811bil mainly due to the increase in subscription
and advertising revenue of RM269.4mil and RM52.2mil respectively.
On the outlook, Astro TV expected subscriber net additions, ARPU and adex to continue to contribute to its revenue growth.
The
conversion of residential subscribers to Astro B.yond set-top boxes is
progressing according to plan and is expected to complete by the next
financial year. This will continue to drive higher take-up of value
added services such as high definition, recording services and
Video-On-Demand, which are the primary drivers of ARPU growth.
However,
this is expected to impact the group EBITDA and net profit for the
remainder of this financial year. The group continues to have good
visibility in respect of content costs which are in line with its
expectation.
It reported net profit of RM118.08mil in the third
quarter ended Oct 30, 2012 from RM103.52mil a year ago, boosted by
unrealised foreign exchange (forex) gains.
There was an
unrealised forex gain of RM30.6mil versus an unrealised forex loss of
RM47.4mil a year ago, which was offset by a decline in earnings before
interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of RM14.3mil and
higher depreciation of RM45.6mil.
Revenue rose 8.3% to
RM1.078bil from RM995.31mil a year ago. Earnings per share were 5.20
sen. It declared an interim dividend of 1.5 sen per share.
The
higher revenue was mainly due to the increase in subscription revenue of
RM74.5mil. The increase in subscription revenue is attributed to both
an increase in ARPU for Pay-TV residential subscribers of RM4.90 (from
RM87.40 to RM92.30) and an increase in number of Pay-TV residential
subscribers from 3,013,500 to 3,213,100.
However, group earnings
before interest, tax, depreciation and amorisation fell by RM14.3ilm
from a year ago mainly due to higher installation, marketing and
distribution costs. These were in relation to customer acquisition as
well as higher B.yond boxes swap out, higher content costs, staff
related costs and impairment of receivables.
As for its
cashflow, cash and cash equivalents increased to RM927.4mil from a year
ago mainly from proceeds from the shares issuance, net of issuance costs
of RM1.387bil. However, this was offset by lower operating cash flows
of RM69mil and payment of dividend of RM366.0mil.
For the nine-month period ended Oct 30, 2012, the earnings fell 29% to RM334.84mil from RM472.04mil.
The
decrease in net profit is mainly due to higher depreciation of
RM113.2mil, decrease in EBITDA of RM46.6mil, and increase in finance
costs of RM70.1mil, which is partly offset by increase in finance income
of RM33.6mil and lower taxation of RM57.7mil.
Disclaimer:
Please note that all data given are merely blogger's opinion. It is strongly recommended that you do your own analysis and research before investing.